In WQHD, the CPU limit finally decreases a bit, especially for the cards we are interested in today. That’s why I consider the tests in the high resolution more relevant, at least in terms of differences between the cards. Because besides the Radeon-GeForce comparison, it’s much more interesting to find out if AMD has finally managed to overcome the old weakness of the RX6000 series in the high resolutions. Again.
The Radeon RX 7800XT MBA is now at least 5.5 percentage points ahead of the Radeon RX 6800XT, which in turn is 11 percentage points ahead of the Radeon RX 7700 XT. The gap to the predecessor Radeon RX 6900XT is 5.5 percentage points and without OC it would only be 3.6 percentage points. The GeForce RTX 4070 is only just ahead of the thirsty XFX card, despite the mix of Raster and DXR. Without DXR, the XFX card would be ahead here, and the AMD card would be about as fast. But the lead, as it was reported in the slides, looks a bit different in my random picks. Let’s put it politely: tie. The RTX 4060 Ti 8GB does not see any ground against the RX 7700XT.
Let’s now look at the Min-FPS, i.e. the one percent of the slowest rendered frames (P1 Low). Here, the Radeon RX 7800XT is clearly ahead of the GeForce RTX 4070 and the XFX card can even catch up with the RX 6900XT. The two Radeon RX 7700XT are now around 6 and 8 percentage points behind the RX 6800XT, respectively, and far ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti and 4040 Ti.
I also logged the power consumption in WQHD for this gaming selection across each benchmark and also cumulated it at the end, so a very clear picture already emerges here. The GeForce RTX 4070 once again has an unassailable lead, but it gets a bit thirstier than in Full HD. The two RX 7800XT need 61 and even almost 85 watts more, respectively, and are once again in the energetic crowbar range.
If you now look at the resulting efficiency, you really almost have tears in your eyes. The Radeon RX 7800XT MBA is still the new card with the best drinking habits, the rest up to the RX 6800 is almost a case for the Betty Ford Clinic, even if AMD nonchalantly calls gamers efficiency muffleurs. That’s certainly easy in a country where electricity doesn’t cost much yet, but the amount makes it.
- 1 - Introduction and overview of Navi32
- 2 - The cards from AMD, Sapphire and XFX at a glance
- 3 - Test system and the igor'sLAB MIFCOM-PC
- 4 - Teardown: PCB and components
- 5 - Teardown: Cooler and surprising material analysis
- 6 - Gaming-Performance in Full-HD (1920 x 1080)
- 7 - Detailed Metrics for Full-HD (1920 x 1080)
- 8 - Gaming-Performance in WQHD (2560 x 1440)
- 9 - Detailed Metrics for WQHD (2560 x 1440)
- 10 - Details: Power consumption and load balancing
- 11 - Load peaks, capping and PSU recommendation
- 12 - Temperatures, clock rates and infrared analysis
- 13 - Fan curves and operating noise
- 14 - Summary and conclusion
167 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
1
Mitglied
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →