PTC Creo is a comprehensive suite of CAD software applications developed by PTC. It provides solutions for product design, simulation, manufacturing, technical documentation and more. As a scalable suite, PTC Creo enables 2D drafting as well as powerful 3D modeling and analysis. With its parametric and direct modeling approach, it helps engineers and designers develop products from concept to production.
Because it is a powerful software, the hardware requirements for PTC Creo are relatively high. For example, users need a powerful processor, sufficient RAM (at least 16 GB or preferably significantly more), a dedicated graphics card with certified drivers optimized specifically for CAD applications, and sufficient hard disk space. The exact hardware requirements may vary depending on the specific use of Creo and the modules used. It is therefore always advisable to obtain information about the current hardware requirements directly from PTC or the respective software provider, or to use this test as a basis
Let’s first look at the GPU Composit Score. I did the sorting of the first bar chart without FSAA. The second chart contains the same results, but sorted in descending order with FSAA. Let’s start without FSAA and be amazed. AMD cleans up here with relish and manages the victory in the cumulative benchmark. But what happens when you want more than just crumbly podiums?
FSAA stands for “Full-Scene Anti-Aliasing”. It is a technique to reduce the so-called “aliasing”. Aliasing, often described as a “stair-step” effect, occurs whenever diagonal or curved lines in a pixel-based display appear jagged or broken. This is due to the angular nature of pixels and the limited resolution of displays. FSAA works by taking multiple samples per pixel and then averaging those samples to determine the final color value of the pixel. This averaging smooths out the hard edges and produces a softer, more realistic image. Many modern graphics cards offer FSAA as an option that can be enabled in the graphics settings. It greatly improves the visual quality of 3D graphics, but it can also take a toll on performance, as more computational work is required to process the extra samples.
And that’s exactly what hits most Radeon Pro then quite hard and NVIDIA catches up tremendously. It’s still not enough for the top, where the Radeon Pro W7900 and the W7800 sandwich the RTX 6000 Ada.
Partial benchmarks
However, it is also worth taking a look at the individual benchmarks that make up the overall result. I have made another small preview for the most important areas, which can be browsed through.
In detail it looks like this:
- 1 - Introduction, test system and software
- 2 - Autodesk AutoCAD 2024
- 3 - Autodesk Inventor Pro 2021
- 4 - PTC Creo 9 - No FSAA vs. FSAA
- 5 - Dassault Systèmes Solidworks 2022 - No FSAA vs. FSAA
- 6 - SPECviewperf 2020
- 7 - Adobe CC: Photoshop
- 8 - Adobe CC: Premiere Pro
- 9 - Adobe CC: After Effects
- 10 - Rendering and GPU compute
- 11 - Power consumption and conclusion
57 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Mitglied
Mitglied
1
1
Urgestein
Mitglied
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Veteran
1
Mitglied
Mitglied
Neuling
Veteran
Mitglied
1
Neuling
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →