Rendering
For this scene, I use the computing power of the graphics cards. NVIDIA comes with CUDA and OptiX and the new Radeon cards can now also use HIP as a render path for hardware acceleration. The performance of the RTX 4080 Super with OptiX is well above that of an RTX 4090 with CUDA and just ahead of the non-Super. The RTX 4080 Super with CUDA is even slightly better than an RTX 3090 with OptiX. So you can already see the advantage of the new Super generation in terms of compute, even if it is rather modest within the two RTX 4080 variants.
CAD in 2D and 3D
Let’s start with AutoCAD 2021. In the benchmark sections in 3D real time, the RTX 4080 Super is just behind the non-Super but still well ahead of the RTX 3090 Ti (driver?).
You don’t have this effect in 2D mode, but the scores are quite close together anyway. You can’t really see any differences, but there is room for improvement for all NVIDIA cards (CPU bottleneck and driver overhead).
Inventor Pro clearly prefers the NVIDIA cards for the graphics composite, but the same applies as for AutoCAD. However, at least the RTX 3090 Ti and the Non-Super can be narrowly beaten.
The cards are closer together again in the Drawing Score. But the card doesn’t really ignite here either.
In the 3ds Max, the RTX 4090 dominates as if there were no tomorrow, followed at some distance by the GeForce RTX 4080 Super and Non-Super and only then the Radeon RX 7900XTX.
At CATIA, the alarm bells are ringing (once again) because both Radeons unleash a disproportionate explosion in performance, especially as the performance of the Radeon RX 7900XTX virtually doubles that of the RX 6950XT. Since this can’t be right, the assumption of a driver bug is very obvious, and I don’t want to accuse anyone of cheating. The graphics quality of the samples also suffers somewhat when you take a closer look. As expected, the RTX 4080 Super is just ahead of the RTX 4080 here.
In Creo, all cards perform fairly consistently – except for the two Radeons. Here too, as in CATIA, OpenGL is used and the same applies as I have just described. This is not plausible, because something seems to have been “forgotten” in the graphics output. The RTX 4080 Super performs quite well within the GeForce family, but has hardly any advantages over the non-Super.
The RTX 4070 Ti is sandwiched between the RX 7900XTX and the RTX 4080 Non-Super, which is a good fit.
In Solidworks, the RTX 4090 is significantly faster, but it’s enough for the old RTX 4080 Non-Super
I have sorted out some programs because their entire full program does not even run without certified hardware. Benchmarks like this would be rather pointless because they have no real background or utility value. Maybe with a little more time I’ll also do various things like Creation and Studio, because I find the topic more than exciting and also use such applications professionally.
- 1 - Introduction, technical data and technology
- 2 - Unboxing and technical details of both cards
- 3 - Test system and measuring equipment
- 4 - Teardown: PCB and components
- 5 - Teardown: Cooler and fans
- 6 - Material analysis: NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super FE 16GB
- 7 - Material analysis: MSI RTX 4080 Super Expert 16GB
- 8 - Gaming-Performance WQHD (2560 x 1440)
- 9 - Gaming Performance Ultra-HD (3840 x 2160)
- 10 - Gaming Performance DLSS vs. FSR
- 11 - Gaming performance with Frame Generation
- 12 - Latencies and lags
- 13 - Workstation graphics and rendering
- 14 - Details: Power consumption and load balancing
- 15 - Load peaks, capping and power supply recommendation
- 16 - Temperatures, clock rates and infrared analysis
- 17 - Fan curves, noise level and audio samples
- 18 - Summary and conclusion
38 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Mitglied
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Moderator
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →