Gaming Performance QHD
I first normalized and cumulated the results of 10 of the 11 games tested, which can give a first impression. Wolfenstein Youngblood is fairly excluded from the overall review because the AMD cards cannot handle the RT effects. We can already see from the accumulated FPS that the lead of both GeForce Radeon RTX 4090 over the other cards is immense and the KFA2 GeForce RTX 4090 SG 24GB (1-Click-OC) still performs a tiny bit faster than the NVIDIA RTX 4090 FE.
In QHD, it is still more than 2 percentage points more performance, which results from the slightly higher boost rates due to the better cooling.
Based on the P1 Low, i.e. the Min-FPS, it is also easy to see that this brute card should also be slowed down a bit by the CPU, even though the Ryzen 9 7950X is currently one of the fastest CPUs available on the market in the new test systems.
Gaming Performance Ultra-HD
The whole thing is then repeated in Ultra HD as well…
…even if the percentage lead is down to around two percentage points.
The P1 Low is also fully within the expected range according to the overall performance.
Gaming Performance Ultra-HD and DLSS/FSR/XeSS
If you then use the image acceleration, not much changes at first, because the distances are still huge.
The card is just under 2 percentage points ahead of the Founders Edition, which is not bad either.
Here, too, the P1 Low is within the average FPS performance with about four percentage points.
- 1 - Introduction, technical data and technology
- 2 - Test System and the igor'sLAB MIFCOM-PC
- 3 - Teardown: PCB and cooler
- 4 - Gaming Performance
- 5 - Power Consumption and load balancing
- 6 - Transients and PSU recommendation
- 7 - Temperatures, clock rates, fans and noise
- 8 - Efficiency. summary and conclusion
109 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Neuling
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →