Let’s also start with the real Intel Core i5-12400 with the measurements in 720p, that is a resolution with 1280 x 720 pixels. Sure, no one plays that way, of course, but it’s at least a theoretical chance to work out differences and do various experiments on the “what if” principle. After all, we want to benchmark the CPUs and not the graphics cards. After all the updates and patches, the differences between Alder Lake and Zen3 have become more relative again, and they have also become much smaller.
If we look at the FPS benchmark bars first, we’ll notice that the differences between the Core i5-12400 and the Ryzen 5 5600X aren’t that big overall, but they do vary greatly from game to game (and setting). In Control, I intentionally use the limiter again to capture a scene like this as well. By the way, the limiter only took effect partially, i.e. not always, as my test scene was quite long and demanding.
But much more interesting was how the individual CPUs behaved here with the power consumption and exactly that I want to discuss later on the next page. Since I was there once, I also didn’t turn the settings completely off in Metro Exodus either, but let the graphics card sweat along properly. So we have tests in CPU bound, a test with alternating CPU and GPU bound, and a test showing what 720p would look like in GPU bound.
First of all, all games as FPS bars, with Intel CPUs mostly leading the way on the P1.
The whole thing now again as a curve with the well visible load distribution over the whole run:
Which brings us back to percentiles. And that’s where you’re actually interested not only in the P1 (1% low), but actually the whole rest of the process. From 97% upwards there is a kink, which is usually only seen from P1 (99%):
The frame times as such are good with all CPUs, no question, you don’t see big differences, it’s always far above the advertised 90%.
Far more interesting, however, are the so-called variances, which also allow a good evaluation of the smoothest possible scrolling.
A cumulation of all games and values can be found later in the summary and overview.
- 1 - Introduction, preface and test systems
- 2 - MSI MEG B660M Mortar WiFi DDR5 in detail
- 3 - MSI MEG B660M Mortar WiFi DDR4 in detail
- 4 - 720p - Gaming Performance
- 5 - 720p - Power consumption and efficiency
- 6 - 1080p - Gaming Performance
- 7 - 1080p - Power consumption and efficiency
- 8 - 1440p - Gaming Performance
- 9 - 1440p - Power consumption and efficiency
- 10 - Overall evaluation of gaming performance
- 11 - Overall evalutaion of power consumption and efficiency
- 12 - Summary and conclusion for gaming
48 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
Veteran
1
Veteran
1
Veteran
1
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Veteran
1
Urgestein
Mitglied
Mitglied
Veteran
1
Urgestein
1
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →