Power consumption and efficiency in mixed workloads
This is where AutoCAD comes in handy, because there are no performance-hungry rendering interludes. The CPU load is usually below 70 percent, often enough even lower, which reflects the normal workday quite well. Also, the Cadalyst run is fairly consistent, including power consumption on systems of varying speed. The Core i5-12400 nabs them all and is well below the Core i5-12600K and Ryzen 5 5600X.
Once again, you can put the score in relation to the power consumption in order to map the efficiency. The Core i9-12400 is even 64 percentage points more efficient than the Ryzen 5 5600X!
Full power during rendering
The Core i5-12400 is also better in terms of absolute consumption than the somewhat slower Ryzen 5 5600X. Funnily enough, you can also manually open the sluices in the Core i5-12400 and thus easily push through up to 180 watts++ – but it hardly gets any faster, only senselessly hot.
If you put power consumption and performance under full load into relation, then the Core i5-12400 only has to admit defeat to the Core i9-12900KF, which is the winner in the 125 watt limit. The Ryzen 5 5600X lands significantly further behind.
- 1 - Introduction and Test System
- 2 - Autodesk AutoCAD 2021
- 3 - Autodesk Inventor 2021 Pro
- 4 - Solidworks 2021
- 5 - Various CAD Benchmarks - SPECvieperf 2020
- 6 - Rendering, Financial, Programming
- 7 - Science and Math (1)
- 8 - Science and Math (2)
- 9 - Power Consumption and Efficiency
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
22 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Veteran
1
Neuling
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →