CPU Reviews

Intel Kaby Lake: Core i7-7700K, i7-7700, i5-7600K and i5-7600 in review

Intel is currently in the midst of the biggest restructuring in the company's history. In terms of its own growth forecasts, the focus is increasingly shifting toward IoT, cloud, and data centers. At the same time, the CPU... 200 chipsets and Optane Ready support Both the 200 and 100 chipsets support Kaby Lake and Skylake processors. This dual compatibility could create an interesting dilemma for enthusiasts who want to create a Skyl... Processors Core i7-7700K Core i7-7700 Core i7-7600K Core i7-7600 Motherboard and memory As the basis of our test platform, we use both the seventh (Kaby Lake) and the sixth (Skylake) generation of core CPUs MSIs Z... Benchmark selection and practical relevance Of course, you could make it easy and roll out synthetic benchmarks that show exactly one thing in the end: that there is actually nothing to show. In any case, not if the respective equivalent ... OpenGL: Cinebench R15 Before we let the very hard guys out, we insert a little synthetic foot insert in the form of the OpenGL benchmark in the Cinebench package. Takt goes ahead, you don't need more than four cores here. Own... Since we were always asked which graphics card or CPU is best when using Adobe CC & co. more intensively, we can now give an answer at least with regard to the CPU - at least as long as it is on our ... 3D-Peformance with dedicated graphics card Of course, the reader will also want to know how good (or bad) a new CPU is when playing challenging titles. For the next two tests, we use an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 FE, which is about as ... Important preliminary remark We have not known since today that the processors are subject to very large variations in quality during production. This time, however, our test samples are not directly from Intel, but are normal retail CPUs... This CPU does not have an open multiplier compared to the core i7-7700K and also has a significantly lower base clock. In addition, Intel's other values (e.g. Ringbus) deliberately chosen in such a way that even an overclocking over an increase... This CPU, like the Core i7-7700K, has an open multiplier and also has a significantly higher base clock than the non-K models. Of course, this also opens up enough space for your own manual overclocking attempts. If the ex works is... This CPU, like the Core i7-7000, does not have an open multiplier compared to the Core i5-7600K and also has a significantly lower base clock. Also with this CPU, an overclocking overane was increased BCLK by certain factory specifications... Golden Sample or Potato Chip? As already written, we have tested this time with pure retail CPUs - exactly with the material that the normal buyer can expect if he wants to upgrade as an "Early Adaptor" in a timely manner. However, it is... Intel's last generations of Intel's CPU have been characterized by a slow progression in incremental upgrades and have not exactly helped to keep their own products at a distance from those of the...

 

This CPU does not have an open multiplier compared to the core i7-7700K and also has a significantly lower base clock. In addition, Intel's other values (e.g. Ringbus) deliberately chosen in such a way that even an overclocking over an increase BCLK hardly makes any sense.

 

If the factory-determined base clock is still 3.6 GHz. so the CPU manages to operate them with 4.0 GHz Turbo Core even under extreme loads on all cores. Let's look at how the CPU behaves under different loads.

 

Core Voltages (Vcore)

 

However, before we get to the power consumption and the resulting temperatures by converting it into waste heat, we first compare the core voltage (Vcore), which should not be confused with the VID adjustable in the BIOS (which is always higher). What we measure here are the real voltage values provided by the converters for the CPU.

 

 

We can clearly see that the tension decreases as the loads increase. This is necessary to ensure that the allowable loss line of the CPU is not exceeded and to ensure that the CPU is not destroyed. The higher the load, the lower the voltage differences in the curve.

 

Normal Load: Gaming

 

We're re-determining the gaming load with Watchdogs 2. First, consider the power consumption as a total value, the proportion of computing units (IA Core) and the remaining functional areas such as cache, memory controller, etc. (Uncore).

 

For example, the standard gaming load requires an average of 50 to 52 watts for the entire CPU, which is a good value and still significantly lower than what Intel specifies for the TDP class in question. You can also see that only up to 40 watts are required for the computing units, because the difference to the total power consumption is distributed over the rest of the CPU.

 

 

In contrast to the increase in temperatures, we have already seen a smaller increase in power consumption values, so that the losses due to leakage currents after heating can increase to up to 1.7 watts.

 

Temperatures rise to varying degrees depending on the position of the respective readout sensor, but stabilize after more than 24 minutes. The package warms up the slowest.

 

 

Heavy Load: Torture (Floating Point Unit)

 

At the next run we let the CPU calculate again, so that a measurably higher power consumption of up to 63 watts results. Losses from leakage currents as warming rise also remain in the same frame as gaming.

 

 

Temperatures are also rising significantly, and once again everything already written for the gaming scenario applies. With up to 58°C, however, everything is still very easy to shear and can be cooled well with simpler air coolers.

 

 

Maximum Load: Intel Power Thermal Utility (100%)

 

If we start the power virus par excellence, then the power consumption increases again very significantly. With up to 88 watts for the entire CPU, you are already scratching at the brand that Intel generally specifies as a TDP. Interestingly, the further losses due to higher leakage currents after heating do not exceed the 2 watt limit compared to the cold CPU.

 

 

With the temperatures, we can see that the package now remains a little cooler and rather marks the lower limit of the averagetemperature over all cores, while the readout value of the package flanks the peak values.

 

 

Intermediate conclusion

 

We may have caught a rather average CPU, which is also not a problem in terms of cooling. The maximum clock speed of four GHz for all cores, when combined with full load operations, is not enough to match the performance of the Core i7-7700K, but it is a good compromise of efficiency, computing power and waste heat to be disposed of.

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung