Quartet Infernale from Ryzen 5 5600X, Ryzen 7 5800X, Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 9 5950X – Which Ryzen type are you and what should you really afford as a gamer?

1 - Intro, Details and Test Setup 2 - As expected: Horizon New Dawn 3 - Even better: Total War: Three Kingdoms 4 - Best Case: World War Z 5 - Lara meets Lisa: Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6 - Intel strikes back: Far Cry New Dawn 7 - Conclusion for Gaming Performance

HD (Ready): 1280 x 720 pixels

There were and are games that simply lie Intel. Or better: lay, even if the distance is rather narrow. The predecessors from our own company are downright humiliated with up to 30% lead. Also, one manufacturer has problems with the highest resolution, which makes this game even more interesting. These results were new to the market because the defective Ryzen 9 5900X ran relatively fast with only one CCD. Now both Ryzen 9s with both CCDs are loosely in the lead, also in power consumption. Whereby the slower i9-10900K also hangs quite sporty on the line and sucks itself forward to second place.

Full-HD: 1920 x 1080 pixels

In Full-HD, the picture is similar, but all CPUs slide a bit closer together, but everything from Ryzen 7 on is faster than the Intel Core i9-10900K, which is also a realization, who is a drinker, but isn’t in that much of a hurry when spurt. 

WQHD: 2560 x 1440 pixels

New resolution, new luck? For the Intel Core i9-10900K it is.  The order is now changing slightly, the distances are getting smaller, only the thirst has remained.

Ultra-HD 3840 x 2160 pixels

I don’t know why, but here all AMD CPUs without exception break down a bit, despite the GPU limit. To what extent this can be fixed to the platform remains to be explored, but it is reproducible. However, the power consumption does not match this. Where here the FPS suddenly stayed, could not be found out in the short time available. But it’s about to get thicker.