Power consumption and efficiency in mixed workloads
This is where AutoCAD comes in handy, because there are no performance-hungry rendering interludes. The CPU load is usually below 70 percent, often enough even lower, which reflects the normal workday quite well. Also, the Cadalyst run is fairly consistent, including power consumption on systems of varying speed. The Core i5-12400 nabs them all and is well below the Core i5-12600K and Ryzen 5 5600X.
Once again, you can put the score in relation to the power consumption in order to map the efficiency. The Core i9-12400 with DDR5 is even almost 77 percentage points more efficient than the Ryzen 5 5600X, with DDR4 it’s still a proud 73 percentage points! It’s almost a small galaxy.
Full power during rendering
Here, the Core i5-12400 is also better in terms of absolute consumption than the slightly slower Ryzen 5 5600X. Funnily enough, you could also manually open the floodgates on the Core i5-12400 and it would still hardly come out any better on the benchmark bar.
If you put power consumption and performance under full load in relation to each other, then the Core i5-12400 doesn’t have to admit defeat to anyone at all and the Ryzen 5 5600X lands significantly further behind.
- 1 - Introduction and test systems
- 2 - Autodesk AutoCAD 2021
- 3 - Autodesk Inventor 2021 Pro
- 4 - Solidworks 2021
- 5 - Various CAD benchmarks - SPECvieperf 2020
- 6 - Rendering, Financial, Programming
- 7 - Science and math (1)
- 8 - Science and math (2)
- 9 - Power consumption and efficiency
- 10 - Summary and conclusion
52 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Mitglied
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Mitglied
1
Mitglied
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →