Color-Performance and Brightness Comparison
As expected, the BenQ Mobiuz will place poorly here. However, you should not overestimate its default performance, because the color accuracy plays a subordinate role in gaming. Whether the tree is now shown in the intended green tone or not, that remains to be seen. The Mobiuz EX3415R is advertised as a gaming monitor. Those who still need to edit their images for websites etc. in the sRGB color space will fall back on the sRGB mode.
Brightness
At that point, I was surprised. Only 218 nits maximum brightness? It is clearly advertised with HDR 400. Without the otherwise “typical XXX Nits” specification, which refers to SDR. If you compare the EX3415R with the XG349C, the panels are on par in terms of minimum brightness. The maximum brightness is already worlds apart. In defense, one could now say that only the very few need more than 200 nits at all, but on the other hand: having is better than needing.
Gray Scale
Saturation
ColorChecker
What can be seen here in any case is that the ASUS and BenQ (default) hardly differ. Both are far from color accurate out of the box. In return, they both deliver a very good sRGB mode. Brightness or not, the price also plays a decisive role in the end. But before I get to the conclusion, let’s look at the calibration results.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Variable Overdrive
- 6 - Display Latencies and Blur Reduction
- 7 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 8 - Direct Comparison
- 9 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
21 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Moderator
Mitglied
Veteran
Urgestein
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
Moderator
Moderator
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →