Display latency
The processing and refresh lag are really good, which results in a low input lag and the E2E latency of under 10 ms is really decent. This puts the BenQ EX3415E on the same level as the ASUS ROG Strix XG349C.
Input lag
E2E Latency
Please note that I have used the pixel response time (default settings) as a basis for the input lag. After all, you can use the default mode up to and including 100 FPS/Hz – without noticeable overshoot.
Motion Blur Reduction
For the readers who don’t want to do without something like that: the EX3415R offers Blur Reduction. But, only with refresh rates of 100 Hz, or more. In addition, Adaptive Sync is deactivated, the display’s brightness is reduced and Flicker-Free is then also history. Presumably, this is known to the users of strobing so far.
Activated, the whole thing looks like this, as shown in the image above: In the upper third of the image, the double image precedes the UFO. In the middle and at the bottom you drag it behind. The image as such becomes much clearer (possibly more legible). It’s a pity that I can’t represent it better. The fact is, you can use it if you absolutely need it. Too bad it doesn’t work in conjunction with Adaptive Sync. If you are looking for the best motion clarity or blur reduction, you should check out Dyac. Pro gamers swear by it. So, since gaming isn’t everything, let’s take a look at the color performance of the EX3415R next.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Variable Overdrive
- 6 - Display Latencies and Blur Reduction
- 7 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 8 - Direct Comparison
- 9 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
21 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Moderator
Mitglied
Veteran
Urgestein
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
Moderator
Moderator
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →