Display latency, Input Lag and E2E
There are no surprises here either. The Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 more or less joins the MSI MEG342C QD-OLED. Once again, I would like to point out that the input lag of a monitor cannot just be the 0.7 ms processing (mathematically calculated). Sometimes you read such fabulous values from other testers/reviewers.
In my opinion, this is an embellished representation of reality. In real terms, the input lag is made up of three components. Processing (scan IN/OUT), refresh lag (half refresh cycle) and the average response time of the pixels themselves. Because in combination, this is what you actually notice in the end.
I would say that the most honest of all measurements in terms of latency is still the E2E latency. This shows you what you actually receive in the end. And here again you can see that an OLED is really fast, but an LCD is still way ahead. What does that tell us? OLEDs simply have to become faster in terms of refresh rate. Let’s remember the display lag of 3.6 ms at this point. Because we will make an interesting discovery today with regard to AMD graphics cards and HDR. I already hinted at this in my article on the MSI MEG342C. It’s worth staying tuned!
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Display Latencies
- 6 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 7 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 8 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 9 - HDR-Performance
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
285 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
Urgestein
Neuling
Veteran
Mitglied
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Moderator
Moderator
Veteran
Veteran
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →