Data Storage Reviews Storage Storage drives

PCIe 4.0 with a new and cheaper concept: MSI SPATIUM M450 NVMe M.2 SSD 1 TB Review

Real-world scenarios and endurance test

Especially the daily use of the SSDs is similar to what SPECwpc says about the drives, since I work with the same or similar applications. Sometimes you notice the value of a very fast SSD, but often you don’t. It is enough to use a normal NVMe, regardless of whether PCIe Gen. 4 or 3. But before I evaluate the SPECwpc, let’s take a look at AJA, because here we have to see how far the dynamic SLC cache and the missing DRAM buffer will go. Unfortunately, AJA does not run for 3 minutes, but even so, there is no visible drop in the stream, even with 64 GB.

And how does that look now when reading the stream? Not bad when you look at the curve. After all, we are still in the consumer sector. I’ve created a more hands-on load here with AJA for better understanding once by having 64GB of video stream read. Well, the theoretically possible (and also measured with CrystalDiskMark) 3700 MB/s are definitely not possible, but with around 3000 MB/s you are still quite well in the race despite the missing buffer. So, the effect is not that bad as long as you really use PCIe 4.0 and thus also connect the involved RAM fast enough. Even though the SSDs are compatible, the PCIe 3.0 then shrinks the whole thing almost to half.

This brings us to SPECwpc and the real-world applications it contains. I’ll dispense with the IOPS and rather stick to the write and read rates in MB/s. Because what is generally written here is small but common, which can also be seen in the low rates. You are far away from the theoretically possible maximum rates and what you can achieve in a constant stream. Let’s first look at the read operations and see that both SSDs are very close to each other and only differ in a few application results.

While the MSI Spatium 450 has to let up a bit in proDEV and CCX compared to the SSD with DRAM buffer, Micron’s new 176-layer NAND wins the rest of the applications, in part even significantly. Even NAMD and Handbrake with rather large reads are certainly dominated by the M450, which is quite astonishing. And it shows once again the lack of significance of simple reading and writing tests.

When it comes to writing, the picture changes somewhat. Handbrake drops sharply compared to the PNY SSD, CCX again weakens a bit. However, the rest is balanced and even goes up to dominant in the direction of the Spatium M450. All in all, the concept can even be said to have an appealing performance in tougher situations and in everyday workstation use.

Temperature behavior

We still need to clarify one point: the temperatures. In general, the SSD is still in the green zone after one hour, even in the stress test without a cooler. Normal applications drive the hottest part, the controller, to 55 to 60 °C, in the stress test it gets up to 70 °C after 30 minutes. If you cool the SSD with a solution implemented on the motherboard (“shield”), it is no longer 60 degrees even in the stress test. That can be convincing, but it is also only between 3 and 4 watts of power dissipation.

Summary and conclusion

What can we take away from this test? Thanks to the faster PCI 4.0, it is also possible to do without a DRAM buffer (with certain restrictions) by including the normal working memory. The theoretical cost savings are not to be sneezed at, because in addition to the saved components on the PCB, this naturally also becomes simpler and thus cheaper. However, the controller can also be cheaper if you no longer have to use and address the DRAM.

In addition, the controller can also be slimmed down further, make do with only 4 channels and integrate a single-core ARM processor in the controller instead of a dual-core one. And last but not least, the new 176-layer TLC is not slower than its 128-layer predecessor, but is supposed to bring many positive changes. All of this also delivered what was promised in the test, amazingly enough. And the heat problem is no longer one either. Fortunately.

MSI assumed an official MSRP of $115 a week ago, which seems quite reasonable since other TLC NVMs with PCIe 4.0 and 1 TB size are usually more expensive. The MSI Spatium M450 did not really make any mistakes in the test, so the concept can be accepted and even recommended in normal application scenarios. The SSD will also be available in Germany soon. As far as the price is concerned, the rumored price of 100 to 115 Euros would certainly be an incentive to buy. Let’s see.

The test sample was provided by the manufacturer without obligation. There was and is no influence on the tests and results and there was no obligation to publish them.

 

Kommentar

Lade neue Kommentare

M
Massaker

Mitglied

85 Kommentare 26 Likes

Traumhafte Spitzenwerte im mittleren Screenshot von ATTO...allerdings nur beim "Laufwerk D:"... ich vermute MSI M450 war dabei "Laufwerk E:", Guten Morgen!:coffee::giggle:(y)

Antwort 1 Like

O
Oberst

Veteran

337 Kommentare 131 Likes

Klingt nach einem vernünftigen Produkt, hat aber durchaus auch gute Konkurrenz in Form der WD Blue SN570 oder WD Black SN750 SE, die bieten ähnliche Leistung für aktuell unter 100€.
Bezüglich QLC: Würde ich nicht als Sackgasse bezeichnen, das braucht einfach auch noch Zeit. Die TBW steigen da auch. Ich finde aber, das größere Problem für QLC ist eher die Schreibleistung bei vollem Cache.

Antwort Gefällt mir

Homerclon

Mitglied

81 Kommentare 38 Likes

Wie sieht die Leistung unter PCIe 3.0 aus? Wenn man einzig die Übertragungsleistungen betrachtet, dürfte es keinen spürbaren Unterschied machen. Aber Theorie und Praxis ...

Antwort Gefällt mir

c
cunhell

Urgestein

552 Kommentare 510 Likes

Wenn ich mir die Benchmarks ansehe ist z.B. eine WD SN750 PCIe 3.0 ist ähnlich performant und man bekommt die SSD immer wieder unter 100€. Nur weil PCIe 4.0 draufsteht macht das doch das Gesamtprodukt nicht lukrativer. Jeder NVMe PCIe 4.0 Slot kann auch NVMe 3.0.
Man kauft eine PCIe 4.0 SSD und bekommt nur PCIe 3.0 Performance. So eine SSD macht die Performancevorteile von PCIe 4.0 quasi obsolet.

Und der unbedarfte Kunde glaub was Tolles zu kaufen weil 4.0 statt 3.0 drauf steht.

Cunhell

Antwort Gefällt mir

H
Headyman

Veteran

116 Kommentare 53 Likes

Ich sehe das auch mit etwas gemischten Gefühlen, Hauptsache PCIe 4.0 steht drauf :rolleyes:.
Und das die Übertragung auch noch massiv einbrechen soll, wenn die Kiste unter Last ist? Also das ist doch kontraproduktiv, wenn ich viele Daten lesen und verarbeiten will, dann ist doch "immer" was los, und dann wird das noch ausgebremst...
Der Preisvorteil ist ja ganz nett und die Anwendungsperformance ist anscheinend doch ganz gut (im Gegensatz zu den Benchmarks).

Warten wirs mal ab, evtl. sieht man ja in den professionellen Workloads noch Argumente.

Vielleicht wird das ja auch ein neuer Benchmark für DDR5, der kann ja besser mit parallelen Workflows...:LOL:

Antwort Gefällt mir

Igor Wallossek

1

10,227 Kommentare 18,931 Likes

Naja, also der Vergleich zur "normalen" PCIe 4.0 SSD war gar nicht so schlecht. Ich habe die SSD jetzt mal einige Tage als System-SSD genutzt und subjektiv keine Verschlechterung festgestellt. Und ich bin wirklich Power-User :D

Antwort Gefällt mir

S
Salierfähig

Neuling

7 Kommentare 4 Likes

Diese und die SN770 machen doch eine echt gute Figur für SSDs ohne DRAM. Klar, eine Corsair MP600 Pro XT (auch mit 176-Layer Micron) ist da noch mehr ausgeglichen im Gesamtbild, aber die kostet ja auch mehr und schluckt den doppelten Strom.
Der Sprung von PCIe3 ohne DRAM zu PCIe4 ohne DRAM ist ja schon gewaltig. Deshalb frage ich mich: Ist da nochmal so ein großer Sprung für PCIe5 ohne DRAM drin? Und ist DRAM dann ab PCIe6 sogar überflüssig, weil es fast keinen Mehrwert bringt? Das wäre echt wild.

Antwort Gefällt mir

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung