Rendering
For this scene, I use the computing power of the graphics cards. NVIDIA comes with CUDA and OptiX and the new Radeon cards can now also use HIP as a render path for hardware acceleration. The performance of the RTX 4070 Ti Super with OptiX is significantly higher than that of an RTX 4090 with CUDA. The RTX 4070 Ti Super with CUDA is even better than an RTX 3090 with OptiX. So you can already see the advantage of the new Super generation in compute.
CAD in 2D and 3D
Let’s start with AutoCAD 2021. In the benchmark sections in 3D real time, the RTX 4070 Ti Super is ahead of the RX 7900XTX and only just behind the RTX 3080 Ti, which performs better with DirectX11 (driver?).
You don’t have this effect in 2D mode, but the scores are quite close together anyway. You can’t really see any differences, but there is potential for improvement for all NVIDIA cards (CPU bottleneck and driver overhead).
Inventor Pro clearly prefers the NVIDIA cards for the graphics composite, but the same applies as for AutoCAD. However, at least the RTX 3090 can be narrowly beaten.
The cards are closer together again in the Drawing Score. But the card doesn’t really ignite here either.
In 3ds Max, the RTX 4090 dominates like there’s no tomorrow, followed at some distance by the GeForce RTX 4080 and then the Radeon RX 7900XTX. However, the RTX 4070 Ti Super is at least only just behind the RTX 3090 Ti.
At CATIA, the alarm bells are ringing (once again) because both Radeons unleash a disproportionate explosion in performance, especially as the performance of the Radeon RX 7900XTX virtually doubles that of the RX 6950XT. Since this can’t be right, the assumption of a driver bug is very obvious, and I don’t want to accuse anyone of cheating. The graphics quality of the samples also suffers somewhat when you take a closer look. As expected, the RTX 4070 Ti Super is still behind the RTX 4080 here.
In Creo, all cards perform fairly consistently – except for the two Radeons. As in CATIA, OpenGL is also used here and the same applies as I have just described. This is not plausible, because something seems to have been “forgotten” in the graphics output. This time, the RTX 4070 Tim Super does quite well within the GeForce family, which is also very close together.
The RTX 4070 Ti is sandwiched between the RX 7900XT and the RTX 3090 Ti, which is a good fit.
In Solidworks, the RTX 4090 is significantly faster, but it’s enough for the RX 7900XTX.
I have sorted out some programs because their entire full program won’t even run without certified hardware. Such benchmarks would be rather pointless, because they have no real background or utility value. Maybe with a little more time I’ll also do various things like Creation and Studio, because I find the topic more than exciting and also use such applications professionally.
- 1 - Introduction, technical data and technology
- 2 - Test system and measuring equipment
- 3 - Teardown: PCB, components and cooler
- 4 - Teardown: material analysis
- 5 - Gaming Performance FHD (1920 x 1080)
- 6 - Gaming-Performance WQHD (2560 x 1440)
- 7 - Gaming Performance Ultra-HD (3840 x 2160)
- 8 - Gaming Performance DLSS vs. FSR
- 9 - Gaming performance with Frame Generation
- 10 - Latencies
- 11 - Workstation graphics and rendering
- 12 - Details: Power consumption and load distribution
- 13 - Load peaks, capping and power supply recommendation
- 14 - Temperatures, clock rates and infrared analysis
- 15 - Fan curves and noise level
- 16 - Summary and conclusion
91 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
1
Urgestein
Mitglied
1
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
1
Mitglied
Veteran
1
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →