Color-Performance, Brightness Comparison and Power Consumption
Due to the fact that it runs – out of the box – in the extended color space, the PG34WCDM can only take the crown in terms of gray scale. In the other disciplines, it is unfortunately only good enough for the midfield. Where the PG34WCDM did surprise me was in terms of maximum brightness in SDR. With Uniform Brightness Mode activated, it is even slightly brighter than the QD-OLED competition. At over 260 nits, this is a current OLED peak value. Although this is still a long way from the LCD monitors, it is generally sufficient for all applications in daylight.
Brightness
Gray Scale, Saturation and ColorChecker
Power Consumption
In terms of power consumption, the PG34WCDM can hold its own against the QD OLED competition. My Samsung OLED G8 sometimes consumes significantly more power than the PG34WCDM.
This is almost certainly due to the WOLED panel. You can like the RWBG layout – or not. The fact is that the white subpixel has a significant impact on power consumption. This also has a positive effect on longevity – I think the risk of burn-in is significantly lower with WOLED than with QD-OLED. I already explained the disadvantage of this pixel structure on the previous page.
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Display Latencies
- 6 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 7 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 8 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 9 - HDR-Performance
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
36 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Mitglied
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
Moderator
Moderator
Urgestein
Mitglied
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Moderator
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →