Gaming GPUs Graphics Reviews

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super in review – the more reasonable RTX 2080 in small and cheaper?

The fact that the RTX 2070 is being upgraded is one thing, because this card hasnot sold so badly. The other thing is the GeForce RTX 2070 Super, which wants to scratch the RTX 2080, which in turn, according to the distributors and the board partner, does not really want to be sold - at least as far as the expected quantities are concerned. Price and performance are only one facet, because this card somehow lacked the target group. For Ultra-HD usually too slow and for QHD often far too expensive, because there is already a GeForce RTX 2070 can tidy up properly.

Introduction

Without going into internals too much, this time I have to start with the fact that this article was written exclusively here in Germany in my laboratory and no longer in the usual cooperation with my esteemed US colleague Chris Angelini, who has been the most important member for 10 years. gaming benchmarks and often parts of the theory. Why this long-standing and very successful cooperation was unilaterally terminated so shortly before the launch and administratively also very strictly prevented, one can guess, but I will not comment further.

There are things that are as they are and therefore do not belong in the public domain. Nevertheless, i would like to take this opportunity to express my thanks once again to my esteemed colleague, because it was a very interesting and very effective cooperation for all those involved.

When such things appear unannounced, unplanned and on the verge of a very high-heeled launch date, it not only confuses the schedules, but in a way you have to improvise before you find a new basis. In today's two launch articles, of course, all my shares are in the usual form and detail, only with the benchmarks I had to limit myself a bit this time with the number (not the detail). But there are also the colleagues of the other media with countless launch articles, so that in the end no one has to die stupidly.

This will be about concentrating on my core competencies now and in the future, the rest will come from itself anyway. The laboratory will be expanded again in the next days and weeks, so that for the future a self-sufficient work will not be a burden, but a pleasure. This also applies to the envisaged cooperation with my French colleagues, with whom I am almost perfectly involved. Europe first also goes, which is only once on the margins

 

Quo Vadis RTX 2070?

The fact that the RTX 2070 is being upgraded is one thing, because this card hasnot sold so badly. The other thing is the GeForce RTX 2070 Super, which wants to scratch the RTX 2080, which in turn, according to the distributors and the board partner, does not really want to be sold – at least as far as the expected quantities are concerned. Price and performance are only one facet, because this card somehow lacked the target group. For Ultra-HD usually too slow and for QHD often far too expensive, because there is already a GeForce RTX 2070 can tidy up properly.

The new S(uper) class could also benefit from ray tracing once there are enough games for the respective target groups. Then QHD also goes with radiation tracking and in just as affordable for the masses. Whether this GeForce RTX 2070 Super can still fill the gap in the market that an RTX 2080 often in vain was aiming for – you'll have to see. The will is somehow there, only the buyer has to play along. Because in the end it is nothing more than an RTX 2070 Ti, which was not allowed to be called that.

 

The TU104-410 of the GeForce RTX 2070 Super

The TU104-410 of the GeForce RTX 2070 Super is reduced to 2560 CUDA cores, 320 tensor cores, 40 RT cores, 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs compared to the full version TU104-400 on the RTX 2080. The number of GPC (Graphics Processing Clusters) varies between 5 and 6 depending on the chip and type of recovery. The card will have clock frequencies in the range of 1605 MHz (base clock) and 1770 MHz (boost) and can thus simultaneously deliver up to 9 TFLOPS computing power. The 40 RT cores can deliver about 7 giga-rays per second in ray tracing performance.

Like the RTX 2080, the RTX 2070 has super 4 MB L2 cache. Otherwise, everything I have already written in the launch articles for the GeForce RTX 2070 FE and the GeForce RTX 2060 FE applies. And if you want to find out more about all the RTX features in detail, please refer to my long basic article "Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 2080 – what is really hidden behind Turing" on the subject of RT. This, too, is read-proof and certainly worthwhile.

The TU104-410 also receives the same 256-bit memory bus as the TU104-400, which has eight 1 GB GDDR6 memory modules with 14 Gb/s data rate, resulting in bandwidth of up to 448 GB/s. As with the GeForce RTX 2080, NVLink support is at least active with one link, which makes the card a little more attractive, because the RTX 2070 was not allowed to use this feature.

The 545 mm2 chip chip contains 13.6 billion transistors. Compared to the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with its 12 billion Transistors on 471 mm2 may seem like a lot, but we must also remember that the chip is cropped and large parts lie fallow.

 

Unboxing and technical data

Compared to the GeForce RTX 2080 FE, the map also has a slight visual change, with the reflective surface on the cover being a great fingerprint file. As with the RTX 2080, the connectors rely on three DisplayPort ports and an HDMI 2.0 port. The USB Type-C jack is also at the start, NVLink is also available at the top of the board. The rest is as usual and for the details there is also the complete tear down.

Here's a first look at the latest version of GPU-Z:

Instead of my own analysis, however, I have at least the technical data at a glance, for which one does not need any physically existing test objects:

  GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 FE
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2080 FE
Architecture (GPU)
Turing (TU106-410) Turing (TU106-400) Turing (TU104-410) Turing (TU104-400)
CUDA Cores
2176 2304 2560 2944
Tensor Cores
272 288 320 368
RT Cores
34 36 40th 48
Texture Units
136 144 160 184
Base Clock Rate
1470 MHz 1410 MHz 1605 MHz 1515 MHz
GPU Boost Rate
1650 MHz 1710 MHz 1770 MHz 1800 MHz
Storage expansion
8GB GDDR5 8GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6 8GB GDDR6
Storage bus
256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit
Bandwidth
448 GB/s 448 GB/s 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
Rops
64 64 64 64
L2 Cache
4 MB 4 MB 4 MB 4 MB
Tdp
175 W 185 W 215 W 225 W
Transistors
10.8 billion 10.8 billion 13.6 billion 13.6 billion
The size
445 mm2 445 mm2 545 mm2 545 mm2
Sli
No No NVLink x8 NVLink x8

 

Test system and measurement methods

I have described the test system and the methodology in the basic article "How we test graphics cards, as of February 2017 already in great detail and therefore for the sake of simplicity now only refer to this detailed description. So if you want to read everything again, you are welcome to do so. Since I am now testing independently here in Germany, the test system has also been upgraded again without having to take into account colleagues.

In this regard, I would like to express my thanks to MIFCOM in Munich, who provide us with the appropriate Intel CPUs, as Intel was and is not willing to sampling at all. For reasons of objectivity, we also accept only offers to which no substantive conditions are attached.

If you are interested, the summary in table form quickly provides a brief overview:

Test systems and measuring rooms
Hardware:
Intel Core i9-9900 KF
MSI MEG Z390 ACE
2x 8GB KFA2 HoF DDR4 4000
1x 1 TByte Patriot Viper (NVMe System SSD)
1x Seagate FastSSD Portable USB-C
Be Quiet Dark Power Pro 11, 850-watt power supply
Cooling:
Alphacool Ice Block XPX
5x Be Quiet! Silent Wings 3 PWM (Closed Case Simulation)
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut (for cooler change)
Housing:
Lian Li PC-T70 with expansion kit and modifications
Modes: Open Benchtable, Closed Case
Monitor: Eizo EV3237-BK
Power consumption:
non-contact DC measurement on the PCIe slot (Riser-Card)
non-contact DC measurement on the external PCIe power supply
Direct voltage measurement on the respective feeders and on the power supply
2x Rohde & Schwarz HMO 3054, 500 MHz multi-channel oscillograph with memory function
4x Rohde & Schwarz HZO50, current togor adapter (1 mA to 30 A, 100 KHz, DC)
4x Rohde & Schwarz HZ355, touch divider (10:1, 500 MHz)
1x Rohde & Schwarz HMC 8012, digital multimeter with storage function
Thermography:
1x Optris PI640, 2x Xi400 Infrared Cameras
Pix Connect evaluation software with profiles
Acoustics:
NTI Audio M2211 (with calibration file)
Steinberg UR12 (with phantom power for the microphones)
Creative X7, Smaart v.7
own low-reflection measuring room, 3.5 x 1.8 x 2.2 m (LxTxH)
Axial measurements, perpendicular to the center of the sound source(s), measuring distance 50 cm
Noise in dBA (Slow) as RTA measurement
Frequency spectrum as a graph
Operating system Windows 10 Pro (1903, all updates), driver as of 06/28/2019

 

 

 

 

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung