Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super review - more memory, bigger chip, faster and also a little thirstier | Page 7

The GeForce RTX 2060 got several scolds for the launch, mainly because of the rather meagre memory expansion of only 6 GB, which was actually not appropriate for the purchase price. Now everything is supposed to be super and you are aiming with an EIA of 419 euros incl. Vat. in the end, a very similar class of buyers. The question is still the question of how the street price will develop with the board partner models, because that was the big weakness after the launch at that time. Current GeForce RTX 2060 is now available from approx. 340 Euro street price.

Metro Exodus I test for better comparability with RTX Off. As long as PresentMon provides me with slightly different records regarding the real runtime on Windows 1903, I would like to make up for this comparison at a later time, when the problem is resolved. The current FPS figures are quite correct, but there are certain inconsistencies in the details. Nevertheless, I decided to benchmark this game while banishing Forza 4 Horizon (UWP) from the benchmarks.

It's also interesting that in ultra HD resolution (and only there!) a kind of 60 FPS limiter seems to work, for whatever reason. Incidentally, this obviously does not happen with the drops during recording on a system that was updated from 1809 to 1903. However, with a complete reinstallation, including the feature update and subsequent patches, the problem is reproducible.

Benchmarks in Full HD with 1920 x 1080 pixels

I have deliberately chosen the highest settings for these benchmarks, as all maps here provide very useful frame rates.

The curves for the FPS gradient, the frametimes, and the percentiles provide further information about what beams cannot fully predict.

And now again all the cards individually with the frametime variances, the actual frametimes and of course the Unevenness index (playability and immersion).

Benchmarks in QHD with 2560 x 1440 pixels

The settings for these resolutions can still be chosen as high throughout, but it is already a compromise for better playability.

The curves for the FPS gradient, the frametimes, and the percentiles provide further information about what beams cannot fully predict.

And now again all the cards individually with the frametime variances, the actual frametimes and of course the Unevenness index (playability and immersion).

Benchmarks in Ultra HD with 3840 x 2160 pixels

Ultra-HD works well if you adjust the settings even further down. For me, the benchmark design is primarily about playability and only second only to absolute beauty.

The curves for the FPS gradient, the frametimes, and the percentiles provide further information about what beams cannot fully predict.

And now again all the cards individually with the frametime variances, the actual frametimes and of course the Unevenness index (playability and immersion).