I’ve included AutoCAD 2021 again because people kept asking about it. 3D and 2D tests are interesting here, the values for CPU and storage are always the same within the measurement tolerances.
The old Quadro RTX 6000 is still the benchmark in 3D, but the Radeon Pro beats the RTX 5000, even if only very narrowly. The old W5700 is clearly behind. In the end, the Radeon Pro W6400 positions itself just ahead of the DG1, but this cannot be attributed to the CPU in 3D mode. A counter-test of the Radeon Pro W6400 ranged between 800 and 804 score points, which is why I didn’t give the whole thing another complete echo due to time constraints.
But what happens on the pure 2D drawing plane? The new and the old test system are also fast here and also fast enough so that differences are still visible even with the really fast GPUs.
In the 2D partial benchmark, the Radeon Pro W6800 even wins ahead of the two Quadro RTXs, which perform absolutely congruently (feat). The advantage over the old Radeon Pro W5700 is clearly visible. The DG1 benefits from slight advantages of the Core i9-12900K in this test, although you can still keep up well with the DG1 here.
I’ll leave out the overall rating so that the platform differences don’t carry too much weight.
Inventor 2021 is still NVIDIA’s domain, at least in my selected benchmark workloads. However, the gap between the Radeon Pro W6800 and the older Radeon Pro W5700 is much smaller.
The chart graphics once again clearly show that the residues arise primarily during modeling. The DG1 is clearly lagging behind, but you always have to keep the performance increase of the DG2 in mind.
12 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
1
Mitglied
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →