Here and now we deal with workstation performance in CAD (real-time display). We cover gaming performance, rendering, and pure compute in other parts of these CPU charts:Part 1 - Gaming... Since AutoCAD can only scale very poorly (3D) to not (2D) over several threads, the available clock and thus of course also the height of the achievable IPC counts here. Intel is clearly ahead of the way, even if AMD is doing well with the Ryzen CPUs. Solidworks and Creo are also not exactly known for high thread scaling in display mode, even if, of course, individual modules demand computing power in computing and rendering. But since today it is only a case of the representational... The two OpenGL classics also benefit from the clock and from a good mid-range CPU, whether from Intel or AMD, the performance is sufficient to very good. All three programs are true core scorners in 3D real-time output, but in turn scale with the beat. For the evaluation in the (semi-) professional, there are certainly much more diversified depending on the software solution(s). Requirement profiles. Nevertheless, one can consider a certain tendency, the AMD's Ryzen certainly potential.
Solidworks and Creo are also not exactly known for high thread scaling in display mode, even if, of course, individual modules demand computing power in computing and rendering. But since today it is all about the display performance of the real-time output, AMD is once again clearly behind Intel. Nevertheless, depending on the user profile, you can also be happy with an AMD Ryzen if you don't call a high-end workstation graphics card your own. As long as the GPU is limited, it almost doesn't matter which newer CPU is in the computer.
Kommentieren