GPUs Graphics Reviews

Palit GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream in review

Palit ranks the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream below the GameRock Premium Edition, but uses the same board, but no Vortex fans. How good is this model compared to its own top model and the competitor cards... Palit uses its own design for this board that is no different from the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GameRock Premium from the same house. At first glance, you can already see that at Palit you can use 2 phases for the memory and a total of... Benchmarks in 2560 x 1440 pixels We have deliberately dispensed with Full HD (1920 x 1080p) as the card runs into the CPU limit even in the highest settings. In WQHD (2560 x 1440 pixels), on the other hand, the actual working environment begins and the Pali... Benchmarks in 3840 x 2160 pixels The Palit GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream is between 7 and 9 percent faster than a GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, depending on the game. TitanX (Pascal). In total, many ... Power consumption at different loads We measured the power consumption of the card in normal operation and at maximum overclocking. The normal power target of 300 watts can be manually increased up to 350 watts in theory, whereby i... Overclocking Manual overclocking with air cooling is rather worthless, even if you can bear the fans working at 2500 rpm at maximum speed. On the one hand, of course, as always, we have the GPU lottery and there probably a worse chip ... Cooling system and backplate Palit has made significant changes to the design of the new cooler, which we will discuss in a while. First of all, here are the facts: Cooling system at a glanceType of the cooler:Air cooling, 2.5...Summary Whether the card is better than the in-house and very similar GamingRock Premium Edition, let's face it. You'd rather answer it with Jain. The fact is that without the Vortex coolers, which are very high in construction, you can do a little more...

Palit ranks the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream below the GameRock Premium Edition, but uses the same board, but no Vortex fans. How good is this model compared to its own top model and competitor cards? This is exactly the question we have asked ourselves and we want to answer it with today's test.

The map follows the SuperJetstream line purely visually, even though some minor cosmetic surgeries have been performed. Of course, this does not make the card any quicker, but it is a little more respectable.

Since the actual performance of all board partner cards depends more on the actual boost clock achieved, and thus causally depends on the cooling, the power target and above all the quality of the respective chip, any test based only on benchmark bars is more of a Random snapshot of a single specimen. This is precisely why we have focused on the actual technical implementation of each model and have been able to document this very well with our equipment.

Unboxing, dimensions and connections

The accessories are limited to the usual three-handers such as DVD, manual and 8-pin adapters. Otherwise, there is only the card. We will discuss their exact board and cooling design separately later. The most important features are first summarized in a table:

Overview of installation dimensions, features and connections
Installation length:
28.6 cm (slot aperture to end cover)
Installation height:
12.5 cm (upper edge slot to top card)
Depth:
5.0 cm (2.5 slot)
0.5 cm baking plate
Weight:
1329 grams
Backplate: Yes, with passive cooling function
Cooling: Air
Horizontally aligned cooling fins
Fan:
2x 10 cm (9.5 cm rotor diameter)
Connections Slot blend:
3x DisplayPort 1.4
1x HDMI 2.0
1x Dual-Link DVI-I
Other shots:
2x SLI Connector
Power supply:
2x 8-pin PCI-Express

Exterior views

Now let's look at the map from the outside. Palit, like many others, is back on a matte, graphite-coloured plastic cover that is haptic and visually fine. The days of red or gold-coloured plastic structures seem to be over here as well. The chrome-like application looks nice, but is extremely scratch-sensitive.

The cooling fins are vertically aligned, the two 8-pin sockets of the external power supply are installed rotated by 180°. The logo on the top is equipped with an RGB backlight and can also be customized by means of its own software.

In the case of the connections, only one HDMI output is used, which e.g. VR glasses are not very accommodating.

Specifications

The GPU-Z screenshot shows us the most important key data in advance, whereby the actual boost achieved was of course higher with our model. This in turn relativizes such theoretical data a little, so that we really want to refer to the following test results later:

Finally, the whole thing again as a tabular comparison to the other relevant graphics card models:

  Nvidia
Titan X
– (Pascal) Mr President, I would like to
Nvidia
Geforce
GTX 1080 Ti FE
Palit
GTX 1080 Ti
SuperJetstream
Nvidia
Geforce
GTX 1080 FE
Nvidia
Geforce
GTX 980 Ti
Gpu
GP102 GP102 GP102 GP104 GM200
CUDA cores
3584 3584 3584 2560 2816
Base clock 1417 MHz 1480 MHz 1557 MHz
1607 MHz 1000 MHz
Boost clock
1531 MHz+ 1582 MHz+ 1671 MHz
1733 MHz+ 1076 MHz+
Memory Size & Type
12 GByte
GDDR5X
11 GByte
GDDR5X
11 GByte
GDDR5X
8 GByte
GDDR5X
6 GByte
GDDR5
The size
471 mm2 471 mm2 471 mm2 314 mm2 601 mm2
Technology
16 nm 16 nm 16 nm 16 nm 28 nm
Transistors
12 billion 12 billion 12 billion 7.2 billion 8 billion
Streaming Multiprocessors (SM)
28 28 28
20 22
GFLOPS (basic clock)
10.157 10.609 11.161
8.228 5.632
Texture Units
224 224 224 160 176
Texture fill rate
317.4 GT/s 331.5 GT/s 348.8 GT/s
257.1 GT/s 214 GT/s
Rops
96 88 88
64 96
Pixel fill rate
136 GPix/s 130.24 GPix/s 137.0 GPix/s
114.2 GPix/s 116.7 GPix/s
Storage data rate
10 Gbps 11 Gbps 11 Gbps 10 Gbps 7 Gbps
Storage bus
384 bits 352 bits 352 bits 256 bits 384 bits
Memory bandwidth
480 GByte/s 484.4 GByte/s 489.3 GByte/s 320 GByte/s 336 GByte/s
L2 cache
3 MByte 2816 KByte 2816 KByte 2 MByte 3 MByte
Tdp
250 watts 250 watts 300 Watt (PT)
180 watts 250 watts

Test system and measurement methods

The new test system and the methodology have already been described in great detail in the basic article "How We Test Graphics Cards" (English: "How We Test Graphics Cards") and therefore, for the sake of simplicity, we now only refer to this detailed Description. So if you want to read everything again, you are welcome to do so. However, we have improved CPU and cooling once again in order to largely exclude possible CPU bottle necks for this fast card.

If you are interested, the summary in table form quickly provides a brief overview:

Test systems and measuring rooms
Hardware:
Intel Core i7-6900K -4.3GHz
MSI X99S XPower Gaming Titanium
Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200
1x 1 TByte Toshiba OCZ RD400 (M.2, System SSD)
2x 960 GByte Toshiba OCZ TR150 (Storage, Images)
Be Quiet Dark Power Pro 11, 850-watt power supply
Windows 10 Pro (all updates)
Cooling:
Alphacool Ice Block XPX
Alphacool Ice Age 2000 Chiller
2x Be Quiet! Silent Wings 3 PWM (Closed Case Simulation)
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut (for cooler change)
Housing:
Lian Li PC-T70 with expansion kit and modifications
Modes: Open Benchtable, Closed Case
Monitor: Eizo EV3237-BK
Power consumption:
non-contact DC measurement on the PCIe slot (Riser-Card)
non-contact DC measurement on the external PCIe power supply
Direct voltage measurement on the respective feeders and on the power supply
2x Rohde & Schwarz HMO 3054, 500 MHz multi-channel oscillograph with memory function
4x Rohde & Schwarz HZO50, current togor adapter (1 mA to 30 A, 100 KHz, DC)
4x Rohde & Schwarz HZ355, touch divider (10:1, 500 MHz)
1x Rohde & Schwarz HMC 8012, digital multimeter with storage function
Thermography:
Optris PI640, infrared camera
PI Connect evaluation software with profiles
Acoustics:
NTI Audio M2211 (with calibration file)
Steinberg UR12 (with phantom power for the microphones)
Creative X7, Smaart v.7
own low-reflection measuring room, 3.5 x 1.8 x 2.2 m (LxTxH)
Axial measurements, perpendicular to the center of the sound source(s), measuring distance 50 cm
Noise in dBA (Slow) as RTA measurement
Frequency spectrum as a graph

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung