GPUs Graphics Reviews

Palit GeForce GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream in review

Palit ranks the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream below the GameRock Premium Edition, but uses the same board, but no Vortex fans. How good is this model compared to its own top model and the competitor cards... Palit uses its own design for this board that is no different from the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GameRock Premium from the same house. At first glance, you can already see that at Palit you can use 2 phases for the memory and a total of... Benchmarks in 2560 x 1440 pixels We have deliberately dispensed with Full HD (1920 x 1080p) as the card runs into the CPU limit even in the highest settings. In WQHD (2560 x 1440 pixels), on the other hand, the actual working environment begins and the Pali... Benchmarks in 3840 x 2160 pixels The Palit GTX 1080 Ti SuperJetstream is between 7 and 9 percent faster than a GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, depending on the game. TitanX (Pascal). In total, many ... Power consumption at different loads We measured the power consumption of the card in normal operation and at maximum overclocking. The normal power target of 300 watts can be manually increased up to 350 watts in theory, whereby i... Overclocking Manual overclocking with air cooling is rather worthless, even if you can bear the fans working at 2500 rpm at maximum speed. On the one hand, of course, as always, we have the GPU lottery and there probably a worse chip ... Cooling system and backplate Palit has made significant changes to the design of the new cooler, which we will discuss in a while. First of all, here are the facts: Cooling system at a glanceType of the cooler:Air cooling, 2.5...Summary Whether the card is better than the in-house and very similar GamingRock Premium Edition, let's face it. You'd rather answer it with Jain. The fact is that without the Vortex coolers, which are very high in construction, you can do a little more...

Power consumption at different loads

We measured the power consumption of the card in normal operation and at maximum overclocking. The normal power target of 300 watts can be manually increased up to 350 watts in theory, with a maximum of 330 watts in practice before boostth.

The respective tensions are then equivalent to this. More than 1.05 V are never available and in the further course under gaming load it is still 1,012 V after warming.

Compliance with the standard on the motherboard slot

With a maximum of 4.2 amps (gaming), the card is still safely below what the PCI SIG sets with a maximum of 5 amps (66 watts) for the 12-volt rail on the motherboard slot. Here it is mainly the memory and some voltage converters for further partial voltages that are connected to the motherboard slot.

Detailed graphics: power consumption and currents

For a better illustration, we have also recorded all measurement results as detailed curves in the graphs below:

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung