Working, creating and designing on the notebook – the workstation and studio test on portable devices

1 - Einführung und Übersicht 2 - Adobe Premiere CC 2020 3 - Black Magic Design DaVinci Resolve 16 4 - Adobe Lightroom Classic (2020) 5 - Autodesk Maya 2019 + Arnold, Octanebench 6 - Blender RTX mit Optix, CUDA und OpenCL 7 - 3ds Max und Inventor Pro 8 - Various CAD and Science Applications 9 - Windows Oberfläche, Zusammenfassung und Fazit

Now we come to the already often mentioned SPECviewperf 13, which has improved in quality and now also offers much more current software fragments and workloads, but these are of course always only tiny excerpts that can be optimized in the respective driver, because the complexity is of course very limited compared to the full software and all this remains reproducible in functionality and process. I absolutely have to start with this, so that one can also better classify the sometimes bad differences to the previous results.

3dsmax_Arch_Graphite

3dsmax_Space_Wireframe

CATIA_plane_01

Creo_02_test_09

Maya_01

NX8_suvStudio2

Showcase_Shadows

SW2012_rallyCar_ShadedEdges

Test1

Test8

For example, the result of the 3ds-max run is somewhat questionable. I manually ported the single tests of the SPECapc for the 2015 version to 2016 and ran parts of it. The performance is almost exactly in line with the results of the 2015 benchmark. And exactly these show quite different results in the right application. The lead is not quite as big as it seems, even though the performance was good throughout.