Gaming performance in QHD – 2560 x 1440 pixels
The card performs around 4 FPS faster than AMD’s RX 6900 XT with SAM on a normalized average with the performance BIOS always in use. By the way, the board partner card was tested exclusively with SAM activated, since the effort for both measurements (i.e. additionally those on an Intel system) would have been too high. However, the increases are very similar, so that you can also orientate yourself on the entry of the AMD card without SAM as a basis. The gap to the GeForce RX 3090 FE is less than 1 FPS and thus both cards are about equally fast.
Expressed in percentages, the whole thing looks like that the card is about 9 percentage points ahead of the GeForce RTX 3080 FE, the lead of the RTX 3090 is practically non-existent, because that almost falls into the area of the measurement tolerances.
Gaming performance in UHD – 3840 x 2160 pixels
The GeForce RTX 3090 FE can hold its own more clearly in UHD against the AMD reference card with SAM in the sum of all games. The Sapphire RX 6900XT Toxic also drops a bit more in UHD and is more than 4 FPS behind the reference card from NVIDIA.
The Sapphire RX 6900XT Toxic is now even 4.5 percentage points behind the GeForce RTX 3090 FE, the lead over AMD’s reference card also increases slightly, which is probably also due to the better cooling and the increased requirements along with waste heat.
But you can read on the next page how much more power consumption this new advantage is linked to in total.
28 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Urgestein
Veteran
1
Neuling
1
Veteran
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →