I included AutoCAD 2021 again because people kept asking about it. 3D and 2D tests are interesting here, the values for CPU and storage are always the same within the measurement tolerances.
The old Quadro RTX 6000 still reigns supreme in 3D, but the RTX A5000 beats the Radeon Pro W6800 and Quadro RTX 5000, albeit just barely. The old W5700 is clearly behind. In the end, this is sort of a draw between the three middle cards
But what happens on the pure 2D drawing plane. The new test system is still fast enough here, so that differences in the CPU-heavy areas become visible.
In the 2D partial benchmark, the RTX A5000 is behind the Radeon Pro W6800 and even behind the two Quadro RTXs, which perform absolutely congruently (feat). The advantage over the old Radeon Pro W5700, on the other hand, is more visible.
In the overall rating, the Cadalyst benchmark sees the Quadro RTX 6000 ahead due to its high 3D performance, but puts the RTX A5000 ahead. the Quadro RTX 5000 and the Radeon Pro W6800 are effectively the same. So it’s a draw.
- 1 - Introduction and technical Data
- 2 - Test System and Methods
- 3 - Teardown: PCB and Cooler
- 4 - AutoCAD 2021
- 5 - Solidworks 2021 (No FSAA)
- 6 - Solidworks 2021 (FSAA Enabled)
- 7 - Inventor Pro 2021
- 8 - 3ds Max, Catia,Creo, Energy
- 9 - Maya, Medical, Siemens NC, SW 2017
- 10 - DirectX 11, DirectX 12, Vulkan, OpenGL und DXR
- 11 - AI und Compute
- 12 - Rendering
- 13 - Power Consumption, Limits and Standards
- 14 - Transients and PSU Recommendation
- 15 - Clock Rate, Temperatures, Fan Speed and Noise
- 16 - Conclusion and final Words
29 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Urgestein
1
1
Urgestein
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
1
1
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
1
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →