PTC Creo is a comprehensive suite of CAD software applications developed by PTC. It offers solutions for product design, simulation, manufacturing, technical documentation and more. As a scalable suite, PTC Creo enables both 2D drafting and powerful 3D modeling and analysis. With its parametric and direct modeling approach, it helps engineers and designers to develop products from the concept phase to production.
As it is a powerful software, the hardware requirements for PTC Creo are relatively high. Users need a powerful processor, sufficient RAM (at least 16 GB or better significantly more), a dedicated graphics card with certified drivers that are specially optimized for CAD applications, as well as sufficient hard disk space. The exact hardware requirements may vary depending on the specific use of Creo and the modules used. It is therefore always advisable to obtain information about the current hardware requirements directly from PTC or the respective software provider or to use this test as a basis
Let’s first look at the GPU Composit Score. I have sorted the bar chart without FSAA. The second, black bar contains the same results, but with FSAA. Let’s start and be amazed. AMD is really enjoying itself here and wins the cumulative benchmark. But what happens if you want more than just crumbly podiums? FSAA stands for “Full-Scene Anti-Aliasing”. This is a technique used to reduce so-called “aliasing”. Aliasing, often described as a “staircase effect”, always occurs when diagonal or curved lines in a pixel-based display appear jagged or interrupted.
This is due to the angular nature of pixels and the limited resolution of screens. FSAA works by taking multiple samples per pixel and then averaging these samples to determine the final color value of the pixel. This averaging smooths out the hard edges and creates a softer, more realistic image. Many modern graphics cards offer FSAA as an option that can be activated in the graphics settings. It significantly improves the visual quality of 3D graphics, but can also put a strain on performance as more computing work is required to process the additional samples. The fact that Battlemage brings up the rear here should be taken as an incentive by Intel.
Partial benchmarks
But here, too, it is worth taking a look at the individual benchmarks that make up the overall result. I have created a small preview for the most important areas that can be scrolled through.
In detail, it looks like this:
- 1 - Introduction, Competitors and Test System
- 2 - Autodesk AutoCAD 2024
- 3 - Autodesk Inventor Pro 2021
- 4 - PTC Creo 9 - No FSAA vs. FSAA
- 5 - Dassault Systèmes Solidworks 2022 - No FSAA vs. FSAA
- 6 - SPECviewperf 2020
- 7 - Adobe CC: Photoshop
- 8 - Adobe CC: Premiere Pro
- 9 - Rendering and GPU-Compute
- 10 - Power Consumption, Summary and Conclusion
32 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
Veteran
1
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Mitglied
1
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Veteran
Veteran
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Veteran
1
Veteran
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →