GPUs Reviews

Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC in review

Asus uses the same board as the ROG Poseidon Platinum hybrid card, but with slight modifications to capacitor assembly. Otherwise, the Strix cooler of course has much more space, which can only be advantageous. The Kart... Asus uses its own design for this board. The two 8-pin sockets for the external power supply are followed by two coils in the input area for smoothing the tips. Asus relies on a design of 5+2 phases, with the 5 phases for the GPU being designed. Benchmarks in 2560 x 1440 pixels We have deliberately dispensed with Full HD (1920 x 1080p) as the card runs into the CPU limit even in the highest settings. In WQHD (2560 x 1440 pixels), on the other hand, the actual working environment and the kar... Benchmarks in 3840 x 2160 pixels The card is also significantly faster in this high resolution than a GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition or GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition. TitanX (Pascal) in Nvidia reference design. Overall, many titles are quite good in ... Power consumption at different loads The power consumption in the gaming loop is pretty much exactly on the point that Asus set as the Power Target with 275 watts in the BIOS. In the Torture loop, the power consumption even drops below this value. Au... Overclocking Manual overclocking with air cooling is average, if you can withstand the fan, which then operates at maximum speed at over 3500 rpm. On the one hand, of course, as always, we have the GPU lottery, on the other hand it is now m... Cooling system and backplate The special feature is the use of a "sandwich" system, which uses a kind of cooling and stabilization frame between the top of the board and the actual heat sink. On an integrated VRM heatsink in the ... Summary The ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC is conspicuously unobtrusive, apart from the unavoidable RGB effects. Asus has left the Power Target at a reasonable 275 watts ex works, which is quite sufficient. Even if you...

Cooling system and backplate

The special feature is the use of a "sandwich" system, which uses a kind of cooling and stabilization frame between the top of the board and the actual heat sink. Unfortunately, Asus dispenses with an integrated VRM heat sink in the cooler and the direct cooling of the memory modules.

Cooling system at a glance
Type of cooler: Air
Heatsink: Nickel-plated Heatsink, GPU-Only
Cooling fins: Aluminum, horizontal alignment
related
Heatpipes 6x 6 mm, nickel-plated
VRM cooling: only via cooling frame
only MOSFETs are cooled
RAM cooling via mounting frame and indirectly via the heatsink
Fan: 3x 9 cm fan modules (gross)
8.6 cm rotor diameter
11 rotor blades
semi-passive lyrised
Backplate Aluminum, blackened
no cooling function
with backlit logo

The backplate is purely for optical enhancement and bears the ROG logo. It does not pay any amount for cooling.

The previously mentioned cooling and assembly frame absorbs the waste heat from the memory modules and also releases it to the GPU heat sink via a further layer of thermal conduction pad. The voltage converters are also cooled by this frame, which still looks for contact to the cooling fins above this area by means of a thick thermal guide pad. Since these have not been angled by 90° in this area, it is reasonable to assume that this solution was only subsequently introduced. In order to stabilize this contact a little better, the cooler is still lying on a thick adhesive pad.

The heat sink is nickel-plated and very smooth. Asus relies on a total of six fast, nickel-plated heatpipes made of composite material, the radii of which are relatively large at the necessary bends. This, like the slightly smaller diameter, ensures better performance.

Fan curves and noise emission ("volume")

The fan curves indicate a rather conservative and volume-optimized control. The hysteresis is a bit hilarious, but the number of starting pulses is just fine, but without being particularly disturbing.

The whole thing does not look much different in the stress test, although due to the slightly lower power consumption the speeds are also slightly lower.

Measurements for fans and noise emission
Fan speeds Open Benchtable Maximum
1715 rpm
Fan speeds Open Benchtable Average
1702 rpm
Fan Speeds Closed Case Maximum 1884 rpm
Fan Speeds Closed Case Average 1874 rpm
Noise emission (air) Maximum
39.0 dB(A)
Noise Emission (Air) Average
38.8 dB(A)
Noise Emission (Air) Idle 0 dB(A)
Sound characteristic /
Hearing impression
hardly lower frequency bearing noises
clearly audible engine noise< 1 Hz
Oscillations due to slightly different fan speeds
hardly spool-feathers
audible air/demolition noises

To illustrate our subjective audio impression once again, we now have a high-resolution graphic with the complete frequency spectrum of our laboratory measurement:

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Igor Wallossek

Editor-in-chief and name-giver of igor'sLAB as the content successor of Tom's Hardware Germany, whose license was returned in June 2019 in order to better meet the qualitative demands of web content and challenges of new media such as YouTube with its own channel.

Computer nerd since 1983, audio freak since 1979 and pretty much open to anything with a plug or battery for over 50 years.

Follow Igor:
YouTube Facebook Instagram Twitter

Werbung

Werbung