Summary of gaming performance in 1440p
And as if I had suspected it: Even in WQHD, everything is already a bit more equal and in Ultra HD there would hardly be any difference. That’s why I’m going to stop at WQHD this time, because the nasty GPU limit already has a somewhat stronger effect in almost all games. Plausibility tests in Ultra HD quickly made it clear to me that the effort is hardly worth it. It’s better to think about a new graphics card if the money is too loose.
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D still has a lead of just under 5 percent over the 7800X3D, which is still more than what you would gain from the clock alone. But that’s as good as it gets, even for the overclocked version, which is only marginally faster at 6.3 percent. Which brings us exactly to my statement in the intro that you can only really make the most of the advantage in Full HD. And a few games even above that, but you almost have to willfully fish them out if you want to think extremely positively. Yes, the CPU is still faster, but also when drinking. Despite the voltage drop, as we’ll see in a moment.
Only the P1 Low still has a slightly larger gap, which can even be perceived subjectively from game to game. If you are rather blind, you are welcome to take a look at the percentiles and variances.
Performance metrics of the individual tests
- 1 - Introduction and technical data
- 2 - Heatspreader details and thermal paste
- 3 - Test setup and methods
- 4 - Fast overclocking and undervolting
- 5 - Gaming Performance HD Ready (1280 x 720 Pixels)
- 6 - Gaming Performance Full HD (1920 x 1080 Pixels)
- 7 - Gaming Performance WQHD (2560 x 1440 Pixels)
- 8 - Power consumption and efficiency
- 9 - Temperatures, summary and conclusion
78 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Urgestein
1
Veteran
Urgestein
Urgestein
Veteran
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
Mitglied
Veteran
Mitglied
1
Urgestein
Neuling
Mitglied
1
Mitglied
Mitglied
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →